<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>NewsRack: newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option</title>
    <link>http://newsrack.in/rss/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option/rss.xml</link>
    <description>This is a custom RSS feed generated by NewsRack for user newstrust for category path newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option in issue Health Care</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:59:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
    <dc:subject>
      <rdf:Description>
        <taxo:topic rdf:resource="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option" />
        <rdf:value>Public Option</rdf:value>
      </rdf:Description>
    </dc:subject>
    <dc:date>2010-03-19T00:59:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>John Shadegg Slips and Says He Would Support Single Payer Health Care - NewsTrust Yahoo Pipes Feed</title>
      <link>http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/john-shadegg-slips-and-says-he-would-suppo</link>
      <description>DOWNLOADS: (45) 


 PLAYS: (132) 


 Oops. Republican John Shadegg appeared on MSNBC just after Dennis Kucinich made his statement saying that he was going to vote for the health care bill . While arguing against the mandate to buy insurance Shadegg let&amp;apos;s one slip and basically made the argument for having single payer health insurance. As The Hill noted, he quickly switched gears. Shadegg (R): &amp;apos;I would support single payer&amp;apos; over individual mandate : 



 Shadegg blasted the for-profit health insurance industry during an appearance on MSNBC today, finally declaring, &amp;quot;I would support single payer.&amp;quot; 

 He quickly clarified his comment, saying he would simply like to see health insurance companies have more competition. 

 &amp;quot;I would support ...</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/john-shadegg-slips-and-says-he-would-suppo</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-03-18T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A look at the health care overhaul bill - Boston Globe: Latest</title>
      <link>http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/03/18/a_look_at_the_health_care_overhaul_bill/</link>
      <description>A look at the health care overhaul bill</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/03/18/a_look_at_the_health_care_overhaul_bill/</guid>
      <dc:creator>The Associated Press</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-18T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A look at the details of the health care overhaul bill - Star Tribune: Politics</title>
      <link>http://www.startribune.com/politics/88467502.html</link>
      <description />
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startribune.com/politics/88467502.html</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-03-18T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zero Public Option + One Mandate = Disaster - Truthout - All Articles</title>
      <link>http://www.truthout.org/zero-public-option-one-mandate-disaster57792</link>
      <description>Not long ago, the most prominent supporters of the public option were touting it as essential for health care reform. Now, suddenly, it&amp;apos;s incidental. 

 In fact, many who were lauding a public option as the key to a better health care future are now condemning just about anyone who insists that the absence of a public option makes the current bill unworthy of support. 

 Consider this statement: &amp;quot;If I were a senator, I would not vote for the current healthcare bill. Any measure that expands private insurers&amp;apos; monopoly over healthcare and transfers millions of taxpayer dollars to private corporations is not real healthcare reform.&amp;quot; 

 read ...</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthout.org/zero-public-option-one-mandate-disaster57792</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rahm, vindicated? Progressives, vindicated? Does it matter? - Daily Kos</title>
      <link>http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/3/18/847491/-Rahm,-vindicated-Progressives,-vindicated-Does-it-matter?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+dailykos%2Findex+%28Daily+Kos%29</link>
      <description>In posts yesterday and today, Ben Smith , Glenn Greenwald , and Chris Bowers explore whether the imminent passage of health care reform with nearly unanimous support from the progressive base -- even though it does not contain a public option -- is a vindication of Rahm Emanuel&amp;apos;s strategy of taking progressives for granted and courting centrists. 

 This question isn&amp;apos;t as simple as it first seems. 

 As Bowers points out , it seems to be based on a faulty assumption. In the wake of Scott Brown&amp;apos;s election, Rahm Emanuel wanted to dramatically scale back the health care reform bill. Emanuel didn&amp;apos;t get his way. So it&amp;apos;s hard to see how he could be vindicated. 

 But it&amp;apos;s also true that many progressives (myself included) at one point conditioned our ...</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/3/18/847491/-Rahm,-vindicated-Progressives,-vindicated-Does-it-matter?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+dailykos%2Findex+%28Daily+Kos%29</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jed Lewison &lt;rss@dailykos.com&gt;</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-18T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Liberals back bill -- with criticism - Washington Post</title>
      <link>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/03/liberals-embrace-health-bill-b.html</link>
      <description>&lt;span class="kicker1"&gt;44&lt;/span&gt; | Even as Democrats fall in line, one calls it a "big compromise from where we could have been."&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=76982472c8390fc87367d157388e3154&amp;amp;p=1"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=76982472c8390fc87367d157388e3154&amp;amp;p=1"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;!-- foo --&gt;</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/03/liberals-embrace-health-bill-b.html</guid>
      <dc:creator>Perry Bacon Jr.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-18T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Has Rahm's Assumption about Progressives been Vindicated? - Common Dreams: Views</title>
      <link>http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/03/18-9</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="author-name"&gt;by Glenn Greenwald&lt;/div&gt;&lt;i&gt;Politico&lt;/i&gt;'s Ben Smith &lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0310/Rahm_vindicated.html" target="_blank"&gt;yesterday
 suggested&lt;/a&gt; that one important aspect of Rahm Emanuel's health care 
strategy -- to ignore the demands of progressives on the ground that 
they would fall into line at the end no matter what -- has been 
vindicated.  Smith points to a new poll showing near-unanimous support 
for the bill among liberals as well as the fact that not a single 
progressive member of the House (not even Dennis Kucinich) will oppose 
this bill even though the prime progressive &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/03/18-9"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/03/18-9</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-03-18T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Everybody Knows The Deal Is Rotten - Commondreams.org Views</title>
      <link>http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/03/18-4</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="author-name"&gt;by Christopher Cooper&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align="justify"&gt;I 
don't want to 
do this. I shouldn't &lt;i&gt;have&lt;/i&gt; to do
 this. 
But the burden is well-settled upon me; the letters and telephone calls 
and 
E-mail messages from the several hundred mostly strangers who have given
 
numerous of my previous essays their praise and who have told me that I 
must 
continue to write when I am as troubled as I now find myself-these 
persons 
deserve what small insight or comfort or advice I can generate for them.
 Would 
that I could summon for them, for us all, some reason to hope.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/03/18-4"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/03/18-4</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ad Wars Ramp Up As Health Bill Vote Draws Near - NPR News</title>
      <link>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124787455&amp;ft=1&amp;f=1001</link>
      <description>As health care overhaul legislation winds its way toward the finish line, both sides are working to get their opinions heard. As usual, some use fear and exaggeration to make their claims. How accurate are these 30-second attempts to boil down a year's worth of debate? We decided to put a few to the test.</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124787455&amp;ft=1&amp;f=1001</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zero Public Option + One Mandate = Disaster - Common Dreams: Headlines</title>
      <link>http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/03/18</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="author-name"&gt;by Norman Solomon&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="field-item"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.commondreams.org/" /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not long ago, the most prominent supporters of the public option were
 
touting it as essential for healthcare reform. Now, suddenly, it's 
incidental.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In fact, many who were lauding a public option as the 
key to a 
better healthcare future are now condemning just about anyone who 
insists that the absence of a public option makes the current bill 
unworthy of support.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/03/18"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/03/18</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ad Wars Ramp Up As Health Bill Draws Near - NPR: Healthcare</title>
      <link>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124787455&amp;ft=1&amp;f=1027</link>
      <description>As a health care overhaul bill winds its way towards the finish line, both sides are working to get their opinions heard. As usual, many of them use fear and exaggeration to make their claims. Here's a look at some particularly egregious examples.</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124787455&amp;ft=1&amp;f=1027</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Moderate’s View Of Health Care Reform - The Moderate Voice</title>
      <link>http://themoderatevoice.com/66221/a-moderates-view-of-health-care-reform/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+themoderatevoice+%28The+Moderate+Voice%29</link>
      <description>One of the fun things about being a political moderate is that you can be sure no matter what you say the odds are you&amp;#8217;ll tick off people on both sides of the political fence. I am quite sure that this will be true as I offer some of my own thoughts on what sort [...]</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/66221/a-moderates-view-of-health-care-reform/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+themoderatevoice+%28The+Moderate+Voice%29</guid>
      <dc:creator>PATRICK EDABURN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Would You Believe a Public Option? - NewsTrust Yahoo Pipes Feed</title>
      <link>http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/03/would_you_believe_a_public_option.php?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Talking-Points-Memo+%28Talking+Points+Memo%3A+by+Joshua+Micah+Marshall%29</link>
      <description>Earlier today, MSNBC&amp;apos;s David Shuster seemed to get Rep. John Shadegg, a very conservative congressman from Arizona, to say that he&amp;apos;d support a &amp;quot;single payer&amp;quot; health care system .

 Our Rachel Slajda followed up with the congressman&amp;apos;s office to see what was up. And his office just responded ... 

 Congressman Shadegg believes health insurance companies should have to compete for our business as individual consumers. Forcing them to compete, even through a public option, would be better than an individual mandate which will not work. ...</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/03/would_you_believe_a_public_option.php?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Talking-Points-Memo+%28Talking+Points+Memo%3A+by+Joshua+Micah+Marshall%29</guid>
      <dc:creator>Josh Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No CBO Score Tonight, Excise Tax Negotiations Back On - Daily Kos</title>
      <link>http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/3/17/847284/-No-CBO-Score-Tonight,-Excise-Tax-Negotiations-Back-On?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+dailykos%2Findex+%28Daily+Kos%29</link>
      <description>The excise tax, the issue that essentially forced the sidecar reconciliation, is back as an issue as Congress tries to find a way to squeeze more savings out of the bill for the CBO without raising taxes on the wealthy or including a public option. The negotiations over this seem to be behind the delay. 



 On Wednesday, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka was called into an unplanned meeting at the White House to discuss late-stage negotiations on a proposed tax on high-end insurance plans. According to sources familiar with what transpired, congressional leaders had begun discussions earlier in the day (perhaps last night) about accelerating the tax&amp;apos;s impact in order to produce more savings under the president&amp;apos;s revised health care bill. 

 Under ...</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/3/17/847284/-No-CBO-Score-Tonight,-Excise-Tax-Negotiations-Back-On?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+dailykos%2Findex+%28Daily+Kos%29</guid>
      <dc:creator>mcjoan &lt;rss@dailykos.com&gt;</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Grayson Introduces Medicare Buy-In as Kucinich Caves - BradBlog</title>
      <link>http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7750</link>
      <description>Guest blogged by Ernest A. Canning


Substantively, not much has changed since we analyzed the Senate version of the health care bill in "'Reform' or Legislative Obscenity?"  

We noted then:


The Baucus bill is a "legislative obscenity that Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) and a former vice president of WellPoint spent months ...</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7750</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Health bill gains ground; weekend vote likely - Boston Globe: Latest</title>
      <link>http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/03/17/health_bill_gains_ground_weekend_vote_likely/</link>
      <description>Health bill gains ground; weekend vote likely</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/03/17/health_bill_gains_ground_weekend_vote_likely/</guid>
      <dc:creator>David Espo, AP Special Correspondent</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pelosi's strategy to get the votes - Ezra Klein</title>
      <link>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/03/pelosis_strategy_to_get_the_vo.html</link>
      <description>Dennis Kucinich&amp;apos;s decision to switch his vote from &amp;quot;no&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;yes&amp;quot; is interesting. The Senate bill, even with the reconciliation fixes, will be a much more conservative document than the House bill. There&amp;apos;ll be no public plan, lower subsidies, an excise tax of some sort, an independent Medicare commission and more. So what you have here is the bill moving to the right even as it picks up votes from the left. 

 If you want to see how Nancy Pelosi gets the votes, Kucinich offers a hint. She unites her left flank, as these folks may not like the bill, but they love what the bill is trying to do and they don&amp;apos;t want to destroy Barack Obama&amp;apos;s presidency. And then she goes to however many Blue Dogs and strays as she needs and says, basically, that this ...</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/03/pelosis_strategy_to_get_the_vo.html</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ezra Klein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Where's the CBO Report? - Daily Kos</title>
      <link>http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/3/17/847214/-Wheres-the-CBO-Report?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+dailykos%2Findex+%28Daily+Kos%29</link>
      <description>Chris lays out the timeline : 



 In order to pass the bill by the Easter recess, and avoid any further delays that could sink the bill, the Senate needs to take up the bill next week. 

 In order for the Senate to take up the reconciliation bill next week, President Obama has to sign the Senate bill into law before he leaves the country for a five day trip on Sunday. 

 In order for President Obama to sign the bill into law before he leaves the country, the House needs to pass the bill by Saturday night. 

 And, in order for the House to pass the bill by Saturday night, the CBO needs to release its score of the bill tonight, 72 hours before the House votes.

 The CBO report is expected today, and has to happen today to meet the deadline. Of ...</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/3/17/847214/-Wheres-the-CBO-Report?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+dailykos%2Findex+%28Daily+Kos%29</guid>
      <dc:creator>mcjoan &lt;rss@dailykos.com&gt;</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can the Democrats finally agree on health reform? - Star Tribune: Politics</title>
      <link>http://www.startribune.com/politics/88224377.html</link>
      <description>After a year of debate, protests, rallies pro and con, endless committee meetings, television ads, political calculations and presidential speeches, the House of Representatives is on the verge of passing major health care reform. Finally.</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startribune.com/politics/88224377.html</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Obama's health care plan picks up support - Vail Colorado: Columnists</title>
      <link>http://www.vaildaily.com/article/20100317/NEWS/100319633</link>
      <description>WASHINGTON - President Barack Obama&amp;apos;s much-challenged health care overhaul gained traction Wednesday as a liberal lawmaker became the first to switch his opposition and Catholic nuns declared their support in an unusual public break with the bishops. 

 Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, long a supporter of Medicare-for-all, voted against the House Democratic bill in November because it did not go far enough in creating a robust government-run plan to compete with private insurance. But Kucinich said Wednesday that the bill coming before the House represents the best chance to expand coverage to the uninsured, even if it does not include a public plan. 

 At a Capitol Hill news conference, Kucinich said his decision was a combination of pragmatism ...</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaildaily.com/article/20100317/NEWS/100319633</guid>
      <dc:creator>ALAN FRAM and RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR Associated Press Writers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-16T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rep. Kucinich switches to 'yes' on health care bill; Catholic nuns break with bishops - Star Tribune: Politics</title>
      <link>http://www.startribune.com/politics/88129737.html</link>
      <description />
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startribune.com/politics/88129737.html</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-03-16T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kucinich - Then and Now - Red State</title>
      <link>http://www.redstate.com/kevin_holtsberry/2010/03/17/kucinich-then-and-now/</link>
      <description>Remember Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) in 2009 who opposed the House version of ObamaCare containing a public option, because the House bill &amp;amp;#8220;put the government in the role of accelerating the privatization of health care.&amp;amp;#8221; He argued that ObamaCare solution is &amp;amp;#8221;within the current structure of a predatory, for-profit insurance system which makes money not providing health care.&amp;amp;#8221; Well, that same Congressman Kucinich has changed and now supports a bill without an explicit public option. Today Congressn Kucinich announced that he will vote for a bill without a public option. Dennis Kucinich has shifted from principled leftist to run of the mill Democrat hack. 

 Kucinch announced that he is going to be a deciding and ...</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/kevin_holtsberry/2010/03/17/kucinich-then-and-now/</guid>
      <dc:creator>()</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-16T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I'm Voting 'Yes' - Commondreams.org Views</title>
      <link>http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/03/17-9</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="author-name"&gt;by Dennis Kucinich&lt;/div&gt;&lt;i&gt;The following are the prepared remarks offered by US Rep. Kucinich today regarding his plans for the upcoming health care vote:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/03/17-9"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/03/17-9</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-03-16T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Public Option's Proponents Seek To Resurrect It - NPR: Healthcare</title>
      <link>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124730861&amp;ft=1&amp;f=1027</link>
      <description>After a messy Senate burial late last year, the government-run health insurance plan may be back. Proponents cite continued wide support and the fact that this time it needs fewer votes to pass in the Senate.</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124730861&amp;ft=1&amp;f=1027</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-03-16T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Proponents Seek To Resurrect Public Option - NPR: Morning Edition</title>
      <link>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124730861&amp;ft=1&amp;f=3</link>
      <description>After a messy Senate burial late last year, the government-run health insurance plan may be back. Proponents cite continued wide support and the fact that this time it needs fewer votes to pass in the Senate.</description>
      <category domain="http://newsrack.in/newstrust/Health-Care/Public-Option">Public Option</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124730861&amp;ft=1&amp;f=3</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-03-16T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

